Post by Miky on Nov 11, 2024 14:58:04 GMT
A recent trend is seeing Competitive games with a ton of players being called "Dead Games". I'm not talking about just fighting games either, every genre that you can think of is having games being called dead and it boggles my mind. Ive come up with a few reasons of why this is.
1). Players dont stick around long term anymore. Games arguably are easier to get than ever, especially with the recent Free to play models. Players have more choices in game than ever, back then when games were $100 in 1990s money you had to make it LAST. The gaming landscape is so much different now. Shooters in the 2000s hardly had ranks or achievements and people still had fun with them for hours on end. Battle Passes have become the new standard for chasing goals. A game not having one more than likely won't have a player chasing it's PVP offering, FOMO and all that.
2). Games dont get clicks anymore after initial hype. Content Creation is at an all time high. What's hot and what's not? Once a game's hype dies down, it can still get Thousands of players but since it doesn't make headlines. Content creators will label it as a dead game and possibly alienate people who aren't in the know. Naturally after time, games will lose populations but rarely will be completely dead.
3). Players dont chase the competition anymore. Something i see recently is that players are straying away from PVP game modes. Enjoying Single player games more. Maybe it's just me but i swear like 80% of the games during the late 2000s were made to be Multiplayer before anything. Indie games and even some bigger companies have been churning out SP games with great success. People do not enjoy sweating after work like they used to.
I would LOVE for you to add or criticize my theory on why people be calling Multiplayer games as "dead". This was inspired by my friend who was calling Super Smash Bros. Ultimate a "dead game". Which boggles my mind. It's like the most sold fighter right now and i hear the competition has only grown. Why do casual players look at an old game and immediately call it "DEAD"? Even one as prolific as Super Smash Bros.?
1). Players dont stick around long term anymore. Games arguably are easier to get than ever, especially with the recent Free to play models. Players have more choices in game than ever, back then when games were $100 in 1990s money you had to make it LAST. The gaming landscape is so much different now. Shooters in the 2000s hardly had ranks or achievements and people still had fun with them for hours on end. Battle Passes have become the new standard for chasing goals. A game not having one more than likely won't have a player chasing it's PVP offering, FOMO and all that.
2). Games dont get clicks anymore after initial hype. Content Creation is at an all time high. What's hot and what's not? Once a game's hype dies down, it can still get Thousands of players but since it doesn't make headlines. Content creators will label it as a dead game and possibly alienate people who aren't in the know. Naturally after time, games will lose populations but rarely will be completely dead.
3). Players dont chase the competition anymore. Something i see recently is that players are straying away from PVP game modes. Enjoying Single player games more. Maybe it's just me but i swear like 80% of the games during the late 2000s were made to be Multiplayer before anything. Indie games and even some bigger companies have been churning out SP games with great success. People do not enjoy sweating after work like they used to.
I would LOVE for you to add or criticize my theory on why people be calling Multiplayer games as "dead". This was inspired by my friend who was calling Super Smash Bros. Ultimate a "dead game". Which boggles my mind. It's like the most sold fighter right now and i hear the competition has only grown. Why do casual players look at an old game and immediately call it "DEAD"? Even one as prolific as Super Smash Bros.?